The phrase "authoritative proof" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to evidence or documentation that is considered reliable and credible, often in academic or legal contexts.
Example: "The study provided authoritative proof of the effectiveness of the new treatment."
Alternatives: "definitive evidence" or "conclusive proof."
For my own history, I've found as solid and authoritative proof as any in my father's 25th Yale University Reunion book, published in 1965.
This report provides authoritative proof that he has broken that promise".
By considering the authority over proof initiation, proof construction, and proof validation, the episodes illustrate how whole-class proving interactions might relate to students' potential development (or maintenance) of authoritative proof schemes.
Chaitanya then travels to Rameswaram, where he listens to the Kurma Purana and obtains the authoritative proof to comfort the brahmin.
The new rules include stricter residency requirements for non-citizens, requiring team managers to have more detailed paperwork documenting their players' eligibility and mandating that more authoritative birth records be presented as proof of age.
The new rules include stricter residency requirements for noncitizens, require team managers to have more detailed paperwork documenting their players' eligibility and mandate that more authoritative birth records be presented as proof of age.
But without work published by peer review, without dialogue and debate in the academic community, without replicating and accumulating evidence from multiple sources – whether that's absent because of bias and fear as Ketchum claims, or because her work is a ploy for fame and funding as many suspect – all of the high and authoritative language falls short of the actual proof.
But without work published by peer review, without dialogue and debate in the academic community, without replicating and accumulating evidence from multiple sources whether that's absent because of bias and fear as Ketchum claims, or because her work is a ploy for fame and funding as many suspect all of the high and authoritative language falls short of the actual proof.
Prompted speech (e.g., following an authoritative script) can yield the recitation of valid proofs (lower pathway of Fig. 2), but we hypothesize that it does so without generating perceptuo-motor forms of knowing that are characteristic of intuitive understanding (e.g., Kellman & Massey, 2013; Kellman, Massey, & Son, 2010; Koedinger, Corbett, & Perfetti, 2012).
Given the prominence of LGT and statistical artifacts, a genome phylogeny cannot be taken as an authoritative statement about organismal or genomic relationships, nor does it constitute proof that such relationships even have meaning [ 56].
