The phrase "authoritarian parenting" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a style of parenting characterized by high demands and low responsiveness, often involving strict rules and expectations.
Example: "Research has shown that children raised with authoritarian parenting may struggle with self-esteem and social skills."
Alternatives: "strict parenting" or "demanding parenting".
To explore whether the relationship between physical activity and depression in adolescents was dependent on parenting style, it was predicted that students with high physical activity but authoritarian parenting style will experience significantly greater depression than those with low physical activity with authoritative parenting style.
Altogether, we conclude that, besides the direct influences of parents as role-models, parental style as indicated by poor emotional relationships and communication and by authoritarian parenting may play a significant role in the socialization of deviant political behavior.
The result showed that there was significant interaction between DRD2 and authoritarian parenting when predicting creativity.
Authoritarian parenting moderated the association between restriction and SSB intake (a marginally significant effect after correcting for multiple comparisons).
It is also discovered that there is a significant relationship between authoritarian parenting style and the adolescent akhlak towards oneself.
An authoritarian parenting style is dominant for fathers and it is correlated with a lack of time necessary for involvement in school activities.
The "authoritarian parent," by contrast, sets a strict standard of conduct, often theologically motivated.
Authoritarian parents are those who emphasize the value and importance of obedience.
Habitually pacified by centuries of czarist rule, the souls of these grownup children pine for the guidance of an authoritarian parent.
In Jean-Jacques Zilbermann's boarding-school comedy, "Bad Spelling," set in the early 70's, Daniel Massu is the principal's nerdy 15-year-old son who leads a student revolution against his authoritarian parents.
But there's another political aspect to the story, relating less to the book's appeal to liberal parents than to its implications for the book's actual subjects, children who bear the force of Chua's brutal methods: namely, the likelihood that authoritarian parents create authoritarian children — children who are willing to endure, endorse, and inflict harsh rule.
