Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "authorised more" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that someone has been given additional authorization, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear.
Example: "The manager has authorised more resources for the project."
Alternatives: "granted additional" or "approved more".
Exact(7)
Managers initially provided little support for his research, though Nichia's president later authorised more funding for the project.The payoff turned out to be huge.
Last year alone, US companies authorised more than $600bn of share buybacks – an impressive amount by any measure, and a record high.
Mervyn King, then governor of the Bank of England, seemed to endorse austerity in 2010; would he have authorised more QE if a Krugman-inspired politician had insisted on no changes to fiscal policy?
He has removed all restrictions on travel and remittances by Cuban-Americans; allowed any American to send up to $2,000 a year to Cuban citizens; and authorised more direct flights and travel by religious and educational groups.The State Department also began regular talks with Cuban officials.
Even within his lifetime (1904-1991), he collaborated on or simply authorised more than half a century's worth of movies: from the moment in 1934 that his "entertainment" Stamboul Train became Orient Express – as he had, rather cynically, hoped - to the poignant swansong that, in 1985, Dr Fischer of Geneva gave to James Mason in his final role.
It did not occur to Rebekah Brooks that a "military contact" for whom she authorised more than £80,000 of payments over a five-year period might be a public official and, therefore, that the payments might be illegal, an Old Bailey jury has heard.
Similar(53)
One pending change would authorise more intelligence sharing between federal and local officials.
The Prime Minister has taken a robust stance in the row that followed, declaring he would be ready to authorise more such attacks to protect national security.
The implication for the Everglades is that the federal government needs to do more to keep its share of the original bargain by authorising more projects and providing the cash it promised.And it needs to do so soon.
At the moment, states virtually have to declare bankruptcy to get the cash.The problems to do with "ancillary benefits" (like food stamps) fortunately do not require Congress to authorise more money, just to simplify the rules.
It also failed, leaving Mr Obama authorising more drone strikes on Islamic militants than George Bush, and nursing abidingly awful relations with Israel's government.Dreaming of the great communicatorNow it is Republicans who seem obsessed with phrasemaking.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com