The phrase "authorise the interception of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to legal or governmental permissions for monitoring communications or activities.
Example: "The court granted the request to authorise the interception of the suspect's phone calls."
Alternatives: "permit the monitoring of" or "allow the surveillance of".
The justifications for authorising the interception of material through Ripa included the interests of national security, detecting serious crime and safeguarding economic wellbeing.
"On the other hand, we have seen evidence that the present legal framework authorising the interception of communications is unclear, has not kept pace with developments in communications technology and does not serve either the government or members of the public satisfactorily.
Under RIPA, the home secretary, rather than a court, has the power to authorise a warrant requiring the interception of any form of communication, including emails, faxes and pagers.
"In the case of the interception of communications of a citizen of this country, the level of evidence necessary should be agreed, validated and authorised preferably by a judge, or in some circumstances by a minister of the state accountable to parliament".
It originally stated that the report by the Interception of Communications Commissioner was about police applications for "interception warrants".
The interception of the conversation is significant.
His flawed measures, unnecessarily restricting public access to official information, and authorising the interception, surveillance and disclosure of journalistic material without a judicial warrant, will make it necessary for the judges to come to the rescue of British rights and freedoms.
"I am absolutely clear that the targeted, and duly authorised, interception of the communications of suspects can be invaluable in the fight against terrorism and other serious crime," Thomas said.
"Current UK law authorises interception of communications not only where the persons concerned have consented to interception but also when the person intercepting the communications has 'reasonable grounds for believing' that consent to do so has been given.
