Exact(3)
Despite its many virtues, Taleb's book is hard to like, since while its author endorses Nietzsche's maxim "What is not intelligible to me is not necessarily unintelligent" he writes according to the opposite principle, dismissing with a sneer all with which he disagrees, such as those in the "phony professions" of journalism and academia.
Note that no one author endorses all of these arguments, and indeed, some authors who are sympathetic to IP have explicitly stated that they don't consider certain of these arguments to be good (for example Mark Kaplan does not endorse the claim that concerns about descriptive realism suggest allowing incompleteness).
The blog above should not be taken to imply that the author endorses (or rejects) any of Ulfkotte's concrete claims or broader theories.
Similar(57)
(Disclaimer: Neither Noisey nor the author endorse the assassination of Presidents, people in politics, or even the sub-human scum who don't pick up their dog's crap from the sidewalk. Increase the peace!).
Some authors endorse the claim that anything is possible (e.g. Mortensen 1989).
To reduce smoking rates further, the study's authors endorsed the use of "proven" interventions, including higher cigarette prices, easy access to quit lines, smoke-free polices for public places and anti-tobacco mass-media efforts like the CDC's "Tips From Former Smokers" campaign.
All authors endorsed the publication.
All authors endorse the final paper.
All authors have made substantive contributions to the study, and all authors endorse the data and conclusions.
In 1982, an article in the British Medical Journal suggested that the "care of [people with diabetes] requires enthusiasm and organisation". 1 The authors endorsed general practice as the setting for the management of uncomplicated diabetes, working closely with hospital specialists.
Approximately one third of patients will develop metastatic disease, 75% involving the chest, and therefore most authors endorse routine imaging of the chest alone, unless further imaging is indicated clinically.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com