The phrase "author's perspective" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the viewpoint or interpretation of a text or piece of work from the author's point of view.
Example: "In her novel, the author's perspective on societal issues is evident through the characters' dialogues and actions."
Alternatives: "writer's viewpoint" or "creator's outlook".
From an agent's and author's perspective, there's not always a strong incentive to move away from traditional advance/royalties either, simply because it's often appealing to bank the guaranteed money and head for the desert.
The original edition is most faithful to the author's perspective as he approached his end.
His approach resulted in a series whose illustrations matched its author's perspective; together, they helped children understand the American past.
But despite (or maybe because of) this, something is amiss in Bradford's book, and it has to do with the author's perspective.
Selecting an opinion writer to "follow" has also had the effect of reminding the student that there is a real person writing these essays, and that the author's perspective and style must be considered when thinking about the passage.
But X is unlikely to see herself in those terms, and even if she does hold (from the author's perspective) some bigoted views, it is doubtful these represent the whole picture.
Besides book titles and details, it contains author's perspectives on their applicability and context.
Although great productions exist, they are often considered too heavy and too much from the author's personal perspective.
This article gives the author's personal perspective on what web user security science might be developed to address the need to be "secure enough" in light of continued evolution.
Merleau-Ponty's texts on the ontological grandeur of Cézanne's painting are not representative of existential aesthetics generally, but reflect only that author's unique perspective on art and ontology.
The article then offers the author's own perspective on why the review is so important; in particular, while offering valuable pointers to what works, i.e. technical issues, it also places in the public arena some of the most important political and ethical issues with which the development of ECEC confronts stakeholders.
