The phrase "authentication and performance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to technology, security, or system evaluations where both authentication processes and performance metrics are being discussed.
Example: "The report highlights the importance of balancing authentication and performance to ensure a secure yet efficient user experience."
Alternatives: "verification and efficiency" or "security and performance metrics".
Therefore, it clearly shows that the FIL re-authentication indeed improves authentication performance and provides better authentication efficiency than two conventional authentication protocols.
For validating the re-authentication efficiency in the FIL re-authentication, the numerical analysis and performance evaluations about the authentication session time, bandwidth cost, and authentication delays are given in the following section.
Her current research interests include security measures in wireless sensor/ad hoc networks, mobile and pervasive computing, broadcast authentication in vehicular networks and performance analysis of mobile cloud clusters.
Alternatively, the simulation results also give one proof that FIL re-authentication has the best authentication performance than other authentication protocols.
In EAP-AKA protocol, the fast re-authentication has the better authentication performance than the full authentication.
This report discusses the design, implementation, and performance evaluation of an authentication scheme for use in a dynamic load balancing environment.
Although biohashing methods have become very popular due to their high authentication performance and easy deployment into match-on-card applications, research recently showed that they might suffer from serious security and privacy problems [4, 11 13].
In this section, the security and performance analysis of the proposed authentication scheme are presented.
Even though several authentication mechanisms have existed so far, data origin authentication in multi-party communications remains a challenging problem in terms of scalability, efficiency and performance.
At times, the CalNet team needs to modify the test environment to upgrade operating systems and software, test new system configurations for improved performance, or implement new authentication and authorization components.
