Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
to explore and understand how midwives perceive and experience decision-making about augmentation of labour.
To compare the combination of intravenous propranolol and oxytocin with oxytocin only in augmentation of labour.
to describe women's experiences of participating in decision-making related to augmentation of labour.
We examined the outcome of labour in women who underwent induction of labour using a Foley catheter, followed by either 1. early amniotomy, or 2. augmentation of labour by oxytocin and late amniotomy.
Results: There was a significant inter-unit variation in the use of intrapartum foetal blood sampling, use of syntocinon for augmentation of labour, mode of delivery, type of perineal damage, postpartum haemorrhage, low Apgar score and admission to SCBU.
We included women having induction or augmentation of labour.
There was no augmentation of labour or fundal pressure.
Most women required oxytocin (77 %) either for induction or augmentation of labour.
Induction of labour consists of amniotomy and augmentation of labour by administration of oxytocine.
These risks were concentrated in subgroups of deliveries that involved induction or augmentation of labour, or an emergency caesarean section.
Effect ratio for instrumental delivery was (OR 1.2; CI 0.3-4.2) and for augmentation of labour (OR:1.0; 0.5-2.3 0.5-2.3
More suggestions(15)
augmentation of protein
augmentation of frataxin
augmentation of thrombin
augmentation of knowledge
augmentation of tumorigenesis
augmentation of pericyte
augmentation of proinflammatory
augmentation of light
augmentation of branching
augmentation of soil
augmentation of carbon
augmentation of pain
augmentation of cell
augmentation of nature
augmentation of walking
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com