The phrase "auditory test results" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the outcomes or findings from tests that assess hearing or auditory function.
Example: "The auditory test results indicated a significant improvement in the patient's hearing ability after treatment."
Alternatives: "hearing test outcomes" or "sound assessment results".
As mentioned in Section 4.3, the auditory test results are influenced by the corpus effect.
P.833.1 [13] using estimations from signal-based speech quality models instead of auditory test results, see Figure 1.
Congruences and discrepancies to auditory test results are discussed, and an outline of work necessary to set up a wideband or even superwideband E-model is given.
In contrast to past work, these parameters are no longer determined on the basis of auditory test results, but from signal-based speech quality models.
Therefore, even though a normalization procedure is applied, the values derived from auditory test results still slightly reflect the differences in the judgments of different test corpora.
In order to evaluate the accuracy of its methodology, Raja et al. [17] compared the derived and values to reference values which have been derived from signal-based speech quality model estimations instead of auditory test results.
In the visual-auditory test, results showed that the immediate performance was significantly above chance level in the multisensory (M = 9.20 and SD = 1.26; t(14) = 18.98, p<.05) and classic (M = 6.67 and SD = 2.9; t(14) = 6.06, p<.05) groups.
This choice of viral delivery route was also supported by our auditory brainstem response (ABR) test results, which showed that the correction of the deafness phenotype in Kcnq1−/− mice was not achieved with viral inoculation into the ST (Supplementary Fig S1B).
The correlation analysis on a vertex-by-vertex basis was performed specifically for the following neuropsychological memory test results: Babcock Test, Rey auditory verbal learning test (AVLT) immediate recall, and Rey AVLT delayed recall.
Pre/post-training application of anodal tDCS when propranolol was administered prior to training reversed contextual memory retrieval whereas only the anodal application prior to training could induce the same result in the auditory test.
We applied WB-PESQ, Modified WB-PESQ and TOSQA-2001 to the WB and the mixed NB/WB databases, and PESQ, Modified PESQ and TOSQA to the databases for which we have results from a NB auditory test available.
