The phrase "auditory recognition" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to psychology, neuroscience, or any field discussing the ability to recognize sounds or auditory stimuli.
Example: "The study focused on auditory recognition and how it varies among different age groups."
Alternatives: "sound recognition" or "auditory identification".
Objectives: We evaluated the integrity of neural pathways for auditory recognition memory in normal newborn infants (n = 32) and infants of diabetic mothers (IDMs, n = 25).
Laboratory training and testing of auditory recognition skills in animals is important for understanding animal communication systems that depend on auditory cues.
Fifteen were selected at random as stimuli to be learned and others used as distractors in the auditory recognition test (each visual distractor was presented twice).
Six outcome variables from the test were considered auditory and visual immediate memory, immediate memory, auditory and visual delayed memory and auditory recognition delayed memory.
Finally, recently, a stronger effect of a visual distractor on auditory recognition than of an auditory distractor on visual recognition was showed [28].
The performance in two intramodal (visual and auditory) recognition tests and two intermodal (visuo-auditory and auditory-visual) recognition tests were evaluated immediately after each intervention and one week after.
Indeed, participants recognized more associations in the visuo-auditory recognition test than in the audio-visual one.
The first result was that the performance in the visuo-auditory recognition test was above chance after both methods but was better after the multisensory learning method than after the classic one.
There was also a main effect of the direction of association [F 1,28) = 26.38 ; p<.0001; with R2 = .49]: Participants performed better in the visuo-auditory recognition test (M = 7.22 and SD = 2.18) than in the audio-visual recognition test (M = 5.47 and SD = 2.19).
The Newmans-Keuls comparisons (with a 0.01 alpha level) revealed that participants after the multisensory learning method recognized more associations in the visuo-auditory recognition test (M = 8.37 and SD = 1.47) than in the audio-visual test (M = 5.87 and SD = 2.03).
Some models of auditory object recognition rely on the use of 'template' or 'memory' spike trains [12].
