The phrase "auditory item" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to sound, hearing, or auditory perception, often in discussions about audio materials or stimuli.
Example: "In the experiment, participants were presented with various auditory items to assess their response to different sound frequencies."
Alternatives: "audio stimulus" or "sound object".
In this paradigm, the author used spatial and auditory items working with different stores (visual-spatial sketchpad and phonological loop) whereas, in our study, we used visual stimuli (color and shape) to work only with the visuospatial sketchpad.
The later part of the oscillations is likely related to binding auditory items into an auditory object.
These estimates allow a concrete understanding of how many visual items cost how many auditory items in performance as the attention allocation changes, as explained in the introduction.
Firstly, participants practised the PASAT and the PASST to determine the rate at which auditory items could be presented during the experiment without them making too many errors.
Using Pavlovian conditioning, it has been shown recently that rats can use sequential visual or auditory information to extract the essential abstract structure of a sequence of auditory items (Murphy et al. 2008).
Posthoc tests with Bonferroni correction revealed that the exclusivity scores of the visual and auditory items (55%) were higher than the scores on the other items (all p values <.001), but did not differ from each other.
For example, studies investigating the impact of presentation modality in working memory have consistently shown that when the modality of presentation is auditory rather than visual, superior recall for auditory items occurs, a finding known as the "modality effect" (e.g. Greene, Elliott and Smith, 1988).
In the speech domain, the pSTS has been shown to have greater activation when simultaneously presented visual and auditory items are congruent (e.g., sound of the latter "A" paired with a visual presentation of the letter "A") than when they are incongruent (Wright et al. 2003; Macaluso et al. 2004; van Atteveldt et al. 2004).
For the tactile temporal order tasks, the maximum SOA was 3,000 ms, whereas the maximum for the auditory four-item temporal order task was 1,500 ms.
For example, for the auditory two-item, different- receptor (dichotic) task, the two sensory inputs cannot interact until the first auditory center in the brainstem processes inputs from both ears (the superior olivary complex).
