The phrase "audited performance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the evaluation or assessment of performance, typically in a business or financial setting.
Example: "The company's audited performance report revealed significant improvements in efficiency over the last quarter."
Alternatives: "assessed performance" or "evaluated performance".
Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports.
Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports.
If you went to a corporate pension plan or a state pension manager, they'd have a very bureaucratic process — probably a fifty or hundred page questionnaire that you had to fill out, you'd have to deal with consultants, and you'd have to have ten years or five years worth of audited performance statistics.
Since he manages only his own account, Middleton does not produce audited performance figures but claims to have tripled his money since July 2007.
The practice level intervention over 6 months included small group training of practice staff, feedback on audited performance, practice facilitation visits and provision of patient education and referral information.
The intervention occurred over 6 months and comprised (1) small group training of practice staff; (2) feedback on audited performance; (3) a series of practice facilitation visits; and (4) provision of patient education resources and referral information (see box 1).
Taken together, our findings provide new evidence on how audit and auditor characteristics impact audit performance, and new insight into how task complexity and auditor experience separately and jointly moderate the impact of auditor effort on performance.
Robust reporting is needed in order to analyze existing rules and dependencies, usage, and to audit performance and maintenance.
Moreover, organisations involved in medical transport should have an effective quality management system that can monitor and audit performance and make recommendations for appropriate improvements [ 15, 56].
It was established in 1998 to provide participating hospitals with a common mechanism for auditing performance against standards defined in the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. 2 Data collection began in October 2000 and by mid-2002 acutecute hospitals in England and Wales were participating in the registry.
Yoong and Spencer 5 audited local performance against national guidelines for aetiological investigation of permanent childhood hearing impairment in Bradford.
