The phrase "audit was identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a specific audit has been recognized or noted, often in reports or discussions about financial or compliance matters.
Example: "During the review process, it was noted that an audit was identified as necessary to ensure compliance with regulations."
Alternatives: "audit was recognized" or "audit was noted".
First, a significant number of requirements, regarding to the safety audit are identified (in compliance with requirement engineering: operational, functional and organic requirements).
In addition, 38 patients who were missed in the original chart audit were identified in the clinic anticoagulation record books.
Challenges to introducing, sustaining and achieving impact with perinatal mortality audit were identified in published and grey literature and programme learning documentation.
Prospective and retrospective antimicrobial-related audits were identified as beneficial approaches for monitoring of the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship interventions.
Study design: SAMM and maternal mortality was identified at daily audit meetings.
Patient informed consent was waived in accord with guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia for a clinical audit [ 9]. S. aureus was identified using routine laboratory methods (catalase-positive, tube coagulase-positive Gram-positive cocci).
The fact that the S.E.C. was vindicated later, when these audit conflicts were identified as one of the accelerants of the dot-com bubble and our proposed independence rules were incorporated into the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley securities law, is of little solace to me.
Specific audit categories were identified from review of the literature, discussion and reflections on clinical practice.
A number of critical barriers to perinatal mortality audit implementation were identified linked to the health information system at all stages - in counting deaths, assigning cause of death and avoidable factors, and documenting recommendations and actions taken.
In a paper in the September-October issue of The Accounting Review, two accounting professors, Joseph V. Carcello of the University of Tennessee and Chan Li of the University of Pittsburgh, looked at what happened in Britain after that country began requiring audit partners to be identified in 2009.
Another approach is the "desk audit", where possible overpayment is identified but the only way to ascertain losses is to sift through heaps of records manually.
