Participants were classified into three modalities: no alcohol user, moderate alcohol user (AUDIT score < 8) or hazardous alcohol users (AUDIT score ≥ 8).
The two factories examined had similar audit scores, but one had better teamwork, employee learning and pay rates; the other unhappier workers and forced overtime.
Implicit and explicit drinking identity had positive, significant associations with AUDIT scores, as expected.
Hazardous Drinking defined by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), scores ≥8 for men, ≥4 for women (N=113).
**Hazardous Drinking defined by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), scores ≥8 for men, ≥4 for women.
Sex moderated implicit but not explicit identity: a weaker positive association with implicit identity and AUDIT scores was observed among men, potentially reflecting stigma against women's drinking.
L. monocytogenes frequency was high, being related to industries that obtained high audit scores with a satisfactory level of GHMP implementation.
Attentional bias was also strongly correlated with self-reported drinking levels (AUDIT scores), and once these were accounted for in the model, females showed greater bias.
For example, based on AUDIT scores, an intervention for alcohol use would have been indicated for 53 % in this sample but for 63 % of respondents in the Inmate Health Survey.
The items are summed to create a total AUDIT score.
