The phrase "audit item" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to financial or compliance audits, referring to specific items or aspects that are being reviewed or assessed.
Example: "During the audit, we identified several audit items that required further investigation to ensure compliance with regulations."
Alternatives: "audit point" or "audit entry".
In addition to these assessment and feedback effects, assessment-only effects were apparent in the AUDIT-C total score primary outcome (P = 0.039 multivariate P-value) and AUDIT item 3 (P = 0.036 multivariate P-value) in comparisons between group 2 and group 3 (Table 3).
The school audit item pertaining to bike lanes separated from the road was omitted, because this feature was absent in all schools.
The factor loadings for each AUDIT item were high indicating that the correlation between each item and the respective latent factor was high (Table 3).
The prevalence of risky drinking (one of two primary outcomes) was higher in group 3 compared with group 1 by approximately 3.7% (P = 0.006 in the multivariate model) and AUDIT item 3 (heavy episodic drinking) was statistically significantly higher in the multivariate model only (P = 0.044; Table 3).
There were consistently small differences in the anticipated direction in comparisons with group 3, which were possibly as a result of chance, with P<0.1 for four of five comparisons for both groups 1 and 2. Restricting the sample to those scoring 2+ on AUDIT item 1 at follow-up diminished any small between-group differences (online Table DS2).
They will look for other items to question you about in addition to the original audit item.
The weighting and distribution of AUDIT items are reported initially, together with a validation of AUDIT scores against a WHO-CIDI-3.0 diagnosis of alcohol use disorder, which was administered by telephone to selected ARMHS participants on the basis of screening using current (30 day) psychological distress (Kessler-10).
It points out potential deductions, red-flags potential audit items and accurately crunches thorny depreciation calculations, all while incorporating a flurry of pesky tax-law tweaks.
In fact, only 61% of the VPD outbreaks occurring during the study period could be included because, in the remaining 39%, no detailed information was available to answer requested audit items correctly.
Audit items were extracted up to 4 months after first presentation to ED.
Through the inclusion of the other AUDIT items we obtain additional information and hence greater precision.
