audio quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "audio quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the clarity, fidelity, or overall sound characteristics of audio recordings or playback. Example: "The audio quality of the podcast was exceptional, making it easy to understand every word."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

Apologies for poor audio quality.

The New York Times

Call audio quality is excellent.

The New York Times - Tech

Audio quality was pretty good, though.

The New York Times

The SoundLink's audio quality was impressive.

The New York Times

Video and audio quality are superb.

The New York Times - Tech

"Perfect audio quality," Mr. Garrison said.

The New York Times

"It has an audio quality to it.

The New York Times - Arts

The audio quality is very good, too.

The Guardian - Tech

QSound develops software that enhances audio quality.

The New York Times

Audio quality wasn't state-of-the-art.

The New York Times - Tech

Audio quality is consistently stellar across the Blu-ray platform.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "audio quality", be specific about the aspects you are evaluating, such as clarity, dynamic range, or noise level. This provides a more nuanced understanding.

Common error

Avoid making blanket statements about "audio quality" without providing context. For example, instead of saying 'the audio quality is bad', specify 'the audio quality suffers from excessive background noise'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "audio quality" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to the overall characteristics of a sound recording or playback, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "audio quality" is a commonly used noun phrase that describes the characteristics of sound, and is used across various contexts. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. When using "audio quality", being specific about the elements you're evaluating, such as clarity or noise level, is recommended. While the phrase itself is suitable for a variety of registers, remember that context matters and that precision can make your communication more effective.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sound fidelity

Focuses on the accuracy and faithfulness of the sound reproduction.

audio fidelity

Similar to sound fidelity, but specifically refers to the faithfulness of audio reproduction.

sound clarity

Emphasizes the clearness and lack of distortion in the audio.

acoustic quality

Highlights the quality of sound characteristics of sound including properties and nuance

aural quality

Focus on quality of something related to hearing or the ear

recording quality

Focuses specifically on the quality of an audio recording.

acoustic properties

Refers to the characteristics of sound within a space or system.

playback quality

Emphasizes the quality of the audio during playback or reproduction.

sonic performance

Highlights the overall effectiveness and capability of sound reproduction.

sound reproduction

Refers to the process and quality of recreating sound.

FAQs

How can I improve the "audio quality" of my recordings?

To enhance your recordings, consider using a high-quality microphone, reducing background noise, and optimizing recording levels. Software solutions for post-processing can also improve the "sound clarity".

What factors affect the "audio quality" of streaming services?

The "audio quality" in streaming depends on the bitrate, the encoding format, and the quality of the source material. Higher bitrates and lossless codecs generally provide better "sound fidelity".

Is "audio quality" subjective or objective?

While personal preferences play a role, "audio quality" also has objective measurements like signal-to-noise ratio and total harmonic distortion. High-fidelity audio aims for accurate "sound reproduction".

What's the difference between "audio quality" and volume?

Volume refers to the loudness of the sound, while "audio quality" encompasses the clarity, fidelity, and overall characteristics of the sound. Good "audio quality" can be present at any volume level.