The phrase "audible quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the clarity or characteristics of sound that can be heard.
Example: "The audible quality of the recording was impressive, making every note crystal clear."
Alternatives: "sound clarity" or "audio quality".
The audible quality of the processed signals was evaluated in the framework of a multiple stimuli with hidden reference and anchor (MUSHRA) test [16].
Although music purists say they can hear the difference between a song played on compact disc and one coded into a format like MP3 or Audible, quality isn't as much of an issue with the spoken word.
Reverberation is an inevitable problem when a speech signal is captured unobtrusively with distant microphones because it degrades the audible quality of speech and the performance of ASR systems.
To investigate the relationship between the SE instrumental test results and the actual audible quality, we conducted the listening test described in Section 3.2.2. Figure 8 shows the listening test results of each submitted system.
The following two metrics were used to evaluate the audible quality: Perceived amount of reverberation: This metric, which represents the perceptual impressions of the degree to which the reference and test sound excerpts are reverberant, assessed the degree of dereverberation a system performed.
The second concerns the perception of audible qualities.
The stream sounds like a complex acoustic structure involving patterns of audible qualities over time.
Thus, familiar accounts of colors and other sensible attributes or secondary qualities might apply to the audible qualities.
The first is to give a sense of how such debates might go in the case of audible qualities.
Pitch, timbre, and loudness are better candidates for simple sensible features in audition (see section 3.2 Audible Qualities).
But, humans hear audible qualities, such as pitch, loudness, and timbre, that are analogous to colors, tastes, and smells.
