The phrase "atypical population" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as research, statistics, or discussions about demographics to refer to a group that does not conform to the usual characteristics or norms of a larger population.
Example: "The study focused on an atypical population of individuals with rare genetic disorders, providing insights that differ from the general findings."
Alternatives: "unusual group" or "non-standard population".
That puts the atypical population nesting in evergreen oaks near Montpellier at a disadvantage: Those trees are not budding, and caterpillars have not yet emerged in May.
The insiders will insist that New York City elections can tell us nothing about future trends, because it's an atypical population.
When this atypical population was excluded from the analysis, divergence trended higher in this group as well.
Finally, given the atypical population dynamic in Hokkaido, a frontier region in the early 20th century to which a large and prolonged wave of migration was in progress, we estimated models without data for Hokkaido.
Of those, 513 were excluded based on low call rate or heterozygosity outliers, atypical population ancestry, sample duplication or relatedness to other sample members, unusual hybridization intensity, and gender mismatches (Trzaskowski et al. 2013b).
66 Taken together, it seems that more than half of never drinkers may be misclassified and that a proportion of correctly defined never drinkers may represent an atypical population subgroup subject to poorer health than the general population in a manner akin to former drinkers.
Resting state functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) has become a particularly useful tool for studying regional relationships in typical and atypical populations.
With respect to the former area, I am interested in the development of emotion regulation in both normative and atypical populations, with particular attention to family and peer factors that may constitute risks for or buffers against future pathology.
One interesting hypothesis that derives from Latash and Anson (1996) proposition is that the coordinative rules for atypical populations are simply different from the typical (normal) population; their central nervous system's priorities are different and the resulting motor patterns are not pathological but adaptive.
We also tested whether the lack of morphological divergence in West Africa was due to chance sampling of atypical populations (details in Text S1).
Future studies may help to elucidate this point, providing a baseline from which to compare the multisensory development of atypical populations and those with sensory deficits.
