The phrase "attrition rates based" is not correct in written English as it is incomplete and lacks clarity.
It could be used in a context where you are discussing metrics or statistics related to attrition rates, but it needs additional words to form a complete thought.
Example: "The report highlights the factors that are attrition rates based, indicating a need for further analysis."
Alternatives: "based on attrition rates" or "attributed to attrition rates".
First, it adds to the quantitative measures of attrition by illustrating different efforts to minimize the attrition rate based on the qualitative understanding of the effective communication patterns.
The base rate of 10% and the likely refusal and attrition rates were based on a study in Baltimore 17 and as discussed above are typical of many populations of people in the UK with schizophrenia.
The expected effect size and attrition rates are based on former trials that studied the effects of cognitive-behavioral group interventions for children with CI.
The units for the y-axis, Attrition Rate, is based on the ratio of workers that separate from an organization to workers that remain in an organization during a fiscal year.
The estimated attrition rate was based on an earlier trial in which 84% of the study participants completed the 6-month follow-up [ 70].
This attrition rate is based on our recent experience in an alcohol dependent population with a high prevalence of comorbidity [ 53].
Most interview studies involve samples that are either compromised by a high attrition rate, or based on survivors who organise and actively work through the crisis in support groups for suicide survivors [ 8].
Large observational cohorts of patients followed over at least 10 years with low attrition rates and population based studies using cancer registry data were suitable for estimating recurrence rates and incidence of new primaries.
Significant baseline differences for function (SMD =-0.81, 95% CI -1.30, -0.33) favouring land based exercise) were found and attrition rates of 26% for land based and 20% of aquatic study participants further confounded a view of valid differences in intervention effects.
