The phrase "attrition found in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the presence or occurrence of attrition in a specific context, such as a study, report, or analysis.
Example: "The report highlights the attrition found in the employee retention rates over the past year."
Alternatives: "attrition observed in" or "attrition noted in".
Lower validity, i.e. greater potential for bias with regard to performance, measurement and attrition, is found in uncontrolled observational studies (Section 3.3.4 to 3.3.5 GMTA).
The attrition rates found in this project imply an increased need to continue to conduct in-service training for HIV/AIDS in the short term.
The sample size was calculated based on the following assumptions: a 12% attrition rate (found in the pilot study); 12 hypothesis tests at the 0.05 level; and an 80% power to detect "medium" effects (0.5 standard deviation) 16 in the primary outcome (composite measure, incorporating balance, strength, and mobility).
No difference was found in attrition between patients allocated to their preference and those who were indifferent.
Finally, our attrition was similar to that found in the Dunedin birth cohort, which assessed 82 97% of a baseline cohort of 1037 children from a total number assessed at birth of 1661.
With 39%% of the completers at t1 also completing measures at t2, the rate of attrition is comparable to that found in a study on monthly follow-ups of an internet-based depression screening, where 33.8 % completed one or more follow-ups [ 53].
In this cohort study, the attrition was similar to the one found in sub-Saharan Africa.
This attrition rate is lower than that found in many dietary interventions (13).
As found in other contexts with high attrition, we do not find evidence that the results are biased by attrition based on tests that use characteristics measured at baseline and during final round field work (Alderman et al. 2001; Fitzgerald et al. 1998).
In contrast, attrition bias was more frequently represented in items found in PT (17%) compared with general health research (7%) tools.
