attrition for each

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "attrition for each" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a specific context involving attrition rates or losses, but without additional context, it is unclear how to use it appropriately. Example: "The report analyzed the attrition for each department, highlighting areas that needed improvement."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Data were collected regarding response rates and attrition for each cohort (with the intention to compare rates between cohorts) but are not reported in detail here.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Figure  1 includes a CONSORT flowchart, detailing the recruitment procedure, group assignment, and reasons for attrition for each group of participants.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

In the revised manuscript, we apply a criterion of 50% attrition for each coherence in each SA regime; that is, we stop when fewer than half of the trials would contribute to the response.

eLife

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

With the proposed sample size of 86 subjects without attrition or 90 subjects adjusted for attrition (45 for each of the two groups), the study will have power of 80%% to yield a statistically significant result for a medium effect size.

BMC Palliative Care

Calculation of cumulative attrition rates for each cohort: CAR = 1- Nti/Nt1) where CAR = Cumulative attrition rate, N = number of people, ti = year in series and t1 = first data year in series (1985).

Human Resources for Health

Calculation of cumulative attrition rates for each cohort: CAR = 1 - Nti/Nt1 where CAR = Cumulative attrition rate, N = number of people, ti = year in series and t1 = first data year in series (1995).

BMC Health Services Research

Annual attrition is calculated by measuring the size of each cadre before new hires multiplied by the workforce attrition rates for each cadre.

Human Resources for Health

The inverse probability of attrition weighting for each participant in wave 4 was given by: mathrm{Stabilized} mathrm{weights} = mathrm{P}left(mathrm{D}4=0right) / mathrm{P}left(mathrm{D}4=0Big|mathrm{L}3, mathrm{L}1right).

Injury Epidemiology

Average ART attrition rates for each patient subgroup before vs. after the earthquake are displayed in Table 2.

Global Health Action

The pattern of attrition reasons for each cadre was the same at provincial hospitals and district hospitals, except for registered nurses and laboratory staff.

Human Resources for Health

Attrition rate for each facility was computed as the number of health workers who left the facility between mid-2004 and mid-2005, divided by the number of health workers who were employed by the facility in mid-2004.

Human Resources for Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing attrition, specify the group or category you are analyzing to provide context and clarity. For example, use "attrition rate for each department" instead of just "attrition for each".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "attrition for each" without specifying what 'each' refers to. This can lead to ambiguity and misinterpretation. Always clarify the groups or categories being analyzed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "attrition for each" functions as an incomplete expression indicating a desire to quantify or analyze attrition across different categories. As Ludwig AI highlights, the phrase is not considered grammatically correct without further specification.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "attrition for each" is grammatically questionable and lacks clarity without specifying what 'each' refers to. As Ludwig AI points out, it's more appropriate to use clearer alternatives like "attrition rate for each department" or "attrition in each group". While examples exist across science and news media, specifying the context is crucial for effective communication. To enhance clarity, always specify the groups or categories being analyzed when discussing attrition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

attrition rate for each

Focuses on quantifying attrition as a rate per unit, providing a more specific metric.

attrition in each group

Highlights attrition within distinct groups or categories, emphasizing comparative analysis.

reasons for attrition in each

Shifts the focus to identifying the causes of attrition within different segments.

attrition analysis per cohort

Specifies the method of analysis, targeting attrition within defined cohorts.

attrition levels by category

Indicates attrition levels differentiated by specific categories or classifications.

attrition patterns across groups

Emphasizes observing trends and patterns in attrition when comparing different groups.

staff turnover for each

Uses "staff turnover" as a synonym for attrition, which means the rate at which employees leave a company and are replaced by new employees.

employee loss for each

Highlights the loss of employees from a company and that has to be quantified for each department

wastage rate for each

Highlights the waste or loss for each and indicates that it is measured as a percentage or a rate.

leakage rate for each

Highlights the gradual loss or attrition for each category. It suggests a continuous outflow or decrease.

FAQs

What does "attrition for each" mean?

The phrase "attrition for each" is not grammatically correct and lacks clarity. It's better to specify what "each" refers to, such as "attrition rate for each department" or "attrition in each group".

How can I accurately discuss attrition rates?

To accurately discuss attrition rates, use phrases like "attrition rate for each", specifying the group or category, or "attrition levels by category" to provide a clearer understanding of the data.

What are some alternatives to "attrition for each"?

Alternatives include "attrition in each group", "reasons for attrition in each", and "attrition patterns across groups". These provide more context and specificity.

Why is "attrition for each" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "attrition for each" is incomplete because it doesn't specify what 'each' refers to. A complete sentence would clarify the context, such as "the attrition rate for each department" or "the reasons for attrition in each cohort".