The phrase "attribution with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the act of assigning credit or recognition to a source or author in various contexts, such as academic writing or content creation.
Example: "The attribution with proper citations is essential to avoid plagiarism in research papers."
Alternatives: "crediting with" or "acknowledgment of".
You come away from "An Englishman Abroad" and "A Question of Attribution" with the distinct feeling that he felt that Burgess and Blunt suffered too much for their sins, if indeed they were sins.
He bolstered the attribution with stylistic parallels to the rest of Shakespeare's work, but the collection is dubious, the parallels are thin, and very few scholars today accept the poem as Shakespeare's.
Roger Pielke, Jr., credited the report authors for avoiding injections of spin — with one seeming exception: There was one interesting change related to the statement on the state of attribution with respect to normalized disaster losses.
It includes his two great dramas about Cambridge spies, "An Englishman Abroad" with Alan Bates and "A Question of Attribution" with James Fox, as well as a selection of earlier pieces.
This blend of technologies allows attribution with greater accuracy.
But Jeff Zwelling is one of the most informed people on last-mile attribution with whom I've spoken.
We focus on the remarkable attributions with (R_{i,l}ge3) in each attribution to identify the community characteristics.
Table 3 shows the fraction of firms' attributions with a p-value < 0.01 among the top four communities.
Contributing to the nascent research on attribution theory in organizations (Martinko et al. 2011), our findings particularly highlight the role of these attributions with regard to proactive behaviors.
They simply aim to explain the provenance of privileged self-attributions, by identifying processes that could generate self-attributions with the epistemic features characteristic of self-knowledge.
Yet, it might be argued again, ordinary language allows for causal attributions with and without causal alternatives or effectual differences (Hitchcock 1996).
