The phrase "attribution of results" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the assignment of credit or responsibility for specific outcomes or findings, often in research or analysis.
Example: "The attribution of results in this study highlights the contributions of various factors to the overall outcome."
Alternatives: "assignment of outcomes" or "credit for results".
As policy changes, improvement methods and resource additions were often deployed simultaneously, one important limitation of our analysis is that attribution of results to any one of these three approaches is difficult.
Questions of attribution of results to the original project itself became less critical.
The (vertical) project approach, as preferred by the GHIs examined by this study, has been identified with short term time horizons, the attribution of results directly to investments and greater control over financial management [ 51].
The 2004 final evaluation reviewed possible confounding factors to the attribution of results to the project and was supportive of a substantial attribution of effect to the project [ 34 ].
Adequacy consists of the observation of a change in the selected indicators after the intervention, and would be sufficient to take decisions under certain conditions; at other times, plausibility would need to be analyzed, defined as attribution of the results to the program or intervention.
Part of the reason for this inapt attribution of research results to public resistance concerns research approach.
Attribution of these results directly to the roll-out of RDTs is not possible because many potential confounding factors exist that cannot be controlled in a descriptive analysis with a comparison to historical data.
When expectations are not fulfilled, trust results in an internal attribution of blame, whereas confidence results in an external attribution of blame.
The role of contextual metadata, also called provenance information, is a key factor ineffective data integration, reproducibility of results, correct attribution of original source, and answering research queries involving " What", " Where", " When", " Which", " Who", "Ho w", and " Why" (also known as the W7 model).
It acknowledges that the social consequences of testing may be either positive, such as improved educational policies and increased resources based on comparisons of student performance, or negative, especially when associated with bias in scoring, unfairness in test use, or errors in interpretation of results and attribution.
The attribution of influenza negative test results to influenza and other viruses is illustrated in Figure 3.
