Sentence examples for attribution of properties from inspiring English sources

These properties strongly influence the characterization system and can lead to mistaken attribution of properties to the device.

Generalizing the latter notion, it has been claimed that reference to self does not proceed by way of attribution of properties or features to oneself at all (Brook 2001).

Taking 'object' in a broader sense, the attribution of properties to objects seems even more widespread: auditory experience can present sounds as loud; proprioception can present pains as throbbing; kinesthetic experience can present one's toes as cold and wiggling; visual experience can present an entire expanse as bright pink; haptic-tactile experience can present a surface as smooth.

The patent arises almost directly from research work and the attribution of property rights to the university is straightforward.

The attribution of property rights can be more difficult here, and the logic of appropriability can clash with the objective of knowledge diffusion.

The type B subnetworks represent the most complex case (multiple ties linking organisations as well as industrial and academic inventors) where the attribution of property right could be more uncertain.

Recently, Capellari and De Stefano (2013, 2014), in a case study on university-owned and university-invented patents of two Italian universities, identified prototypes of different relational mechanisms of knowledge diffusion through patenting, embedding different rationales for the attribution of property rights.

An additional benefit is the interpretability of the features, allowing attribution of biophysical properties to the identified clusters.

He tried to show that, when philosophers carry out such investigations, they find that, roughly speaking, it is the way people act that leads to the attribution of these properties and that there is no involvement of anything internally private.

At the very least, the position of surviving duties as delineated presupposes the possibility of the attribution of posthumous properties and, more particularly, of their change an assumption that has been defended as rather unproblematic (see Ruben 1988, 223 31).

The limited use of available markers not only fails to differentiate multiple populations within the conventional core subsets, but also could potentially lead to erroneous attribution of functional properties.