The phrase "attribution after" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to specify that attribution or credit should be given following a certain action or statement.
Example: "In academic writing, it is important to provide attribution after quoting a source to avoid plagiarism."
Alternatives: "credit following" or "acknowledgment later".
Professor Ellis separates because from since: "The cause must trigger the direct effect, not evolve through some circuitous route, as is the case with 'since.' " She also has good advice for the placement of quotation attributions: "For maximum clarity and effective presentation of a short quote, put the attribution after the statement".
You may do a double-take over the attribution — after all, it was President Obama who mentioned plans to "win the future" six times in this year's State of the Union address (then mocked himself for it at the White House Correspondents Dinnerr).
Many papers place the quote attribution after the first sentence of the quote.
But, as Wen highlights, the extant findings provide only mixed support for external attributions after failures.
This effect has been replicated dozens of times, and its scope has been greatly expanded from intentionality attributions after violations of a moral norm to attributions of diverse properties after violations of a wide variety of norms.
Given that many participants did not attempt source attributions after giving F judgments, as would be expected, the Pr measure was restricted to R judgments.
It only applies to acts of false attribution perpetrated after 1 August 1989, and lasts for 20 years after the death of the person falsely attributed with authorship.
Many of the attributions added after his death are considered to be unreliable, and much work has been done in the last decades of the 20th century to correct attributions on stylistic grounds.
That attribution was removed after it was questioned and no definitive credit could be determined.
The attribution should come after the first full sentence of the quote.
But the Veronese expert Terisio Pignatti and W. R. Rearick, an authority on 16th-century Venetian painting, endorsed its attribution to Veronese after examining it.
