The phrase "attributes of an innovation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the characteristics or features that define a particular innovation or new idea.
Example: "The attributes of an innovation include its uniqueness, practicality, and potential for market impact."
Alternatives: "features of an innovation" or "characteristics of an innovation".
Rogers [35] indicated that the five attributes of an innovation are: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability.
TAM is grounded in the assumption that the way consumers evaluate the attributes of an innovation is ultimately related to their decision to adopt the innovation (Claudy et al. 2015).
The attributes of an innovation include five user-perceived qualities: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability [ 34].
To encourage technology adoption, from the perspective of Rogers' "diffusion of innovations" theory, designers should carefully take into account the "perceived attributes" of an innovation.
In the most comprehensive review of innovation diffusion in services organizations to date, Greenhalgh et al. [ 2] compile what is referred to as the "standard" attributes of an innovation ripe for adoption.
Furthermore, the sit-to-stand activity possesses several of the attributes of an innovation that is more likely to be adopted, according to Rogers Diffusionn of Innovations theory: low complexity, relative advantage, compatibility, and trialability [ 22].
In this study, interoperability is related to compatibility, which is a perceived attribute of an innovation.
There are four main determinants of success of an IT innovation: communication channels, the attributes of the innovation, the characteristics of the adopters, and the social system [ 34].
In order to investigate this, a simulation model that distinguishes between the real attributes of the innovation and their perceived levels by the user groups has been developed.
The innovation characteristics comprise the perceived attributes of the innovation that either encourage or hinder.
With reference to this framework we then compare the attributes of national innovation systems, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial innovation, and categorize contextual influences on entrepreneurial innovation.
