The phrase "attributed to this explanation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the source or origin of a particular idea, statement, or phenomenon that is linked to a specific explanation.
Example: "The increase in temperature can be attributed to this explanation regarding climate change."
Alternatives: "ascribed to this explanation" or "credited to this explanation".
Even though we could not show the reasons behind this finding, several explanations could be attributed to this non-compliance, including poor training of health care workers at the time of Xpert introduction.
Note that the increased simple-spike firing rate preceded the time of the CS response and therefore cannot be attributed to a trivial explanation such as bleed-through of the CS spike into the train of spikes used to calculate simple-spike firing rate.
11 Even if well designed studies have provided a relatively unbiased estimate of the effect size for an environmental intervention (causal estimation), some authors argue that valid causal inference in public health also depends on showing how an intervention brings about the outcomes attributed to it (causal explanation).
Their emergence is attributed to different explanations of ethnic entrepreneurship, including cultural orientation, discriminatory practices in the larger society, the availability of ethnic and class resources, and market opportunity structure due to both local social economic and the larger political institutional environments.
If this account is true, an association between inhalation of formaldehyde and leukemia would be understood as not plausible for humans, and the few positive associations that have been observed would be attributed to alternative explanations (i.e., to other chemical exposures in the workplace, or lifestyle-related exposures such as smoking or alcohol consumption, or simply to chance).
This could be attributed to two plausible explanations.
The difference cannot be attributed to completely innocent explanations".
The above results can be attributed to the following explanations: both the MWCO and molecular diameter [obtained from Eq. (9)] of GAH are smaller than NAG (at 25 °C, the molecular diameters for GAH and NAG are 0.61 and 0.67 nm, respectively).
Client refusal of condom use may be attributed to two possible explanations.
This sex difference is often attributed to steroid hormones, an explanation that is not relevant for this sample of young children not yet approaching puberty.
