The phrase "attributed to the variance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the causes or reasons for differences or changes in data or results.
Example: "The discrepancies in the survey results can be attributed to the variance in participant demographics."
Alternatives: "ascribed to the variance" or "assigned to the variance".
These differences were attributed to the variance in the pressure and flow distributions from the different facilities and across ventilated and natural supercavitation.
For this carbon estimation procedure, the portion of uncertainty attributed to the variance of the probability-based estimator of the population mean using the plot-level predictions is usually correctly estimated, but the portion attributed to the variance of the allometric model estimator is usually ignored.
The spatial difference of susceptibility classes can be attributed to the variance of procedure [subjective (AHP) and objective (FR)] in weighting the factors and their classes whereas, the spatial similarity of the susceptibility zones may have occurred due to the use of similar causal factors and the landslide inventory data for both the modeling methods.
A number of moderator or confounding variables may have attributed to the variance in effect sizes.
However, when considered as two populations containing a number of sub-populations, 11% of the total variation could be attributed to the variance between the regions, while only 4% was attributed to the variation among populations (Table 3).
These differences in the kidneys and liver could be attributed to the variances in the clearance and catabolism of the chelates on the Ab conjugate, 225Ac-DOTA chelate vs 111In-DTPA chelate [41].
Hence, the heterogeneity is probably attributed to the variances with regard to features of population, the subtypes of TNBC, the disease stages, the antibody source, the dilution rate, the cut-off value of AR and EGFR expression, and so forth.
This discrepancy might be attributed to the high variance in the mRNA levels of these genes, which precluded their achieving statistical significance in the micro-array analyses.
The differences between sexes could be attributed to the greater variance in TUG times among female non-fallers.
The difficulty to clearly infer about the possible manipulating mechanism in our study species is most likely attributed to the large variance in clutch size (see Figure 1).
Differences in patient selection may have attributed to the observed variance of effect of adjuvant (H IPEC within the different studies.
