The phrase "attributed to the substance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing characteristics, effects, or properties that are ascribed to a particular substance in scientific or analytical contexts.
Example: "The healing properties of the herbal extract are often attributed to the substance's high concentration of antioxidants."
Alternatives: "ascribed to the substance" or "credited to the substance".
With the collapse of the divide between created substances and the infinite substance, attributes play a new role for Spinoza; traditional divine attributes are eliminated while attributes traditionally associated with created substances (Extension in particular) are attributed to the infinite substance.
In metaphoric terms, causality is attributed to the right substance being activated in the right conditions.
In addition, we need to monitor adverse events that, instead of being directly attributed to the 'active' substance, could be attributed more to aspects such as inappropriate use, medication errors, poor quality products or drug-drug interactions.
The low viability of PEG-coated SWSB could be attributed to the toxic substances (i.e. monomer, dimer, and trimer), impurities (e.g. fatty acids, catalyst residue, ethylene oxide) and by-product (e.g. 1,4-dioxane) present in the low-molecular-weight glycol used in this study [41 43].
The low percentage of mature seed germination observed in Cephalanthera falcata is attributed to the accumulation of substances such as lignin in the inner integument, a possible cause of germination inhibition (Yamazaki and Miyoshi 2006).
Eligible men were aged between 65 84 and resident in Perth at the time of recruitment, were free of dementia and did not have mental or neurological disorders that could be attributed to the use of substances (such as alcohol) or HIV.
The anti-tumor effects can be attributed to the antiangiogenic effects of the substance, which are mediated by the inhibition of the receptor tyrosine kinases Flk-1/KDR (VEGR2), PDGFRbeta and FGFR1.
It is speculated that the variations between surface free energy method and AFM measurement can be attributed to the differences in probe substance, test scale and measured components.
The low gas production in these tests can be attributed to the very high test substance to biomass ratio used.
