The phrase "attributed to staff" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something, such as a statement or action, is credited to or associated with the staff members of an organization.
Example: "The success of the project was largely attributed to staff who worked tirelessly to meet the deadlines."
Alternatives: "credited to staff" or "ascribed to staff".
The majority of DeepMind's expenses — up 104% to £333.8 million ($433 million) — can be attributed to staff, which cost the company £200 million ($260 million) in 2017, up 91% from £104.7 million ($136 million) in 2016.
The primary source of noise within the clinical environment has been attributed to staff behaviours, which Kahn et al. [76] reported accounted for greater than 50% of noise sources with an average noise level of 84dBB.
Barriers to change in maternity care have been attributed to staff who are stressed and consequently resistant to change, as well as poor management and financial restraints [ 45].
The majority of this cost was attributed to staff and consultants and to the development and maintenance of the web-based data repository.
The primary source of noise within the clinical environment has been attributed to staff behaviours, which Kahn et al. [ 76] reported accounted for greater than 50% of noise sources with an average noise level of 84dBB.
A failing WADA attribute to staffing issues and resource constraints.
There have been comments in the press attributed to Toyota staff stating they never wanted to be No. 1. That's simply not true.
Breaking the numbers down by the company's segments, AOL's Brand Group (a group that includes TechCrunch, which is owned by AOL) saw revenue increase 4percenttoto $222 million, and its OIBDA (operating income before depreciation and amortization) more than quadrupled, to $35.6 million, something that AOL attributed to cutting staff and lowering marketing costs.
The decision was attributed to the "staff" and the reasons behind it were given as follows.
Delays were also attributed to low staff to patient ratio and busy patient schedules.
Many staff were not exposed to the full project so could the observed lack of change of attitudes over time be partly attributed to new staff?
