The phrase "attributed to a selection" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the source or origin of a particular idea, quote, or piece of information that is linked to a specific choice or group of choices.
Example: "The findings in this report are attributed to a selection of studies conducted over the past decade."
Alternatives: "credited to a choice" or "ascribed to a selection".
This phenomenon has been attributed to a selection pressure for somatic hypermutations, which generally are observed at much higher frequencies in translocated copies than in ectopic copies.
However, this is not what we observe (Fig. 3), and this cannot be attributed to a selection bias against phonological deficits in the control group (phonological tasks were not used at all in selection criteria).
This imbalance has to be attributed to a selection bias of the randomisation procedure since the patients were not stratified according to their response to previous front-line chemotherapy.
The over-representation of females in general across all four surveys-remaining present when excluding the pregnancy-related consultations - could be attributed to a selection bias, as interviews were conducted at home during the day, when men are most likely to be working outside of the household.
Lambs on the lasalocid diets consumed more fiber, which might be attributed to a greater selection of fibrous components of the diet.
Table 2 Compilation of potential P-statements attributed to a small selection of cosmetic product formulas Product/pictograms and signal word/H statements Corresponding P-statements Hair spray Prevention: DANGER H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapour.
The difference in ASA status distribution (group A included a greater number of ASA III patients, whereas group B had a greater incidence of ASA I patients) can be attributed to a technique selection bias due to the combination of anterior approach general anesthesia.
This could be attributed to a stronger selection process due to mortality that is usually observed to be higher among men than among women.
This distinction might be attributed to a possible selection bias in patients who presented with aggressive clinical courses due to difficulty indicating general surgery.
The inconsistency between our results and those of previous analyses that suggested a negative prognostic impact of adjuvant treatments could be attributed to a better selection of the patients as well as to the regimens employed in our studies, and particularly to the activity of taxanes in metastatic breast cancer (Ghersi et al, 2003).
The primary reason for these problems can be attributed to an intensive selection in poultry breeding during the last 60 years [ 76].
