The phrase "attributed the science" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be used in contexts discussing the assignment of scientific principles or discoveries to a particular source or individual, but it requires additional context to be meaningful.
Example: "The researchers attributed the science behind climate change to the extensive studies conducted over the past decade."
Alternatives: "credited the science" or "ascribed the science".
The Austrian science minister attributed the decision to budget issues Austrian scientists, however, had thought the latest budget brought good news.
Sidney Barish, the principal at Schreiber, attributed the school's showing to research programs in science, math and social science.
Zhmud translates pragmateia as "science" (2012a, 216) so that he has Aristoxenus attributing the invention of the science of number to Pythagoras but, while Aristoxenus does use pragmateia to mean science in some contexts, it more commonly simply means "pursuit" (Huffman 2014b, 292).
Facing this muddled circumstance on explanations in science classroom, Treagust and Harrison (2000) made the first clarification by attributing the explanations in science classroom into three categories: folk explanation, instructional explanation, and scientific explanation (Fig. 1).
He attributed the neologism to:.
The music means little and if the bands can't be arsed releasing stuff every year – ie, if the musicians can't take the music seriously – then why should the public take the bands seriously?" Doddles brought the science, attributing the sales fall-off to simple mathematics.
It seems absurd, then, to attribute the sex imbalance among science faculties to innate differences between men and women.
You attribute the decline in children's science awareness from "backyard tinkering" partly to television, video games and computers ("When Backyards Were Laboratories," Week in Review, May 19).
Rather than taking a searching inventory of the relevant history or undertaking an effort to understand the political science, he attributes the fact that "Presidents did stuff" to a hazy concept called "leadership" and proceeds to conclude that if a president isn't successfully "doing some stuff" then that president "can't lead".
