Sentence examples similar to attributed into two groups from inspiring English sources

Tadj_Ox: all individuals were re-attributed into two groups, according to 25% interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (Tadj_Ox0 <= 25%, Tadj_Ox1 > 25%), or to 10% interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (Tadj_Bj0 < 10%, Tadj_Bj1 >= 10%).

Tubular atrophy/ interstitial fibrosis was analyzed as Oxford score, Beijing score Tadj_Ox: all individuals were re-attributed into two groups, according to 25% interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (Tadj_Ox0 < =25%, Tadj_Ox1 > 25%); Tadj_Bj: all individuals were re-attributed to 10% interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (Tadj_Bj0 < 10%, Tadj_Bj1 >= 10%).

So here we re-attributed all individuals into two groups, by 10% interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (Tadj_Bj0 < 10%, Tadj_Bi1 >= 10%), then by 25% interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (Tadj_Ox0 < =25%, Tadj_Ox1 > 25%) and re-analyzed the association of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy with plasma uric acid level, both in the whole cohort and subgroup with normal eGFR.

Kano's model categorizes service attributes into three major groups: Must-be, One-dimensional and Attractive.

Gronroos [ 20] argues that these attributes can be divided into two groups: functional (ambience, i.e. description of the form in which the service is delivered) and technical (outcome, i.e. the quality of what is delivered).

Since different process conditions are required to fill capsules with powders that have very different material attributes, the powders were divided into two groups.

The attributes of the auctioned objects are usually divided into two groups: technical and business attributes.

In the current work, DAM attributes of SB, SI, SF, and SD were empirically subclassified into two groups based on their rate of SFP evolution.

The service quality measurement methods in the literature can be broadly categorized into two groups: incident-based and attribute-based methods (Stauss and Weinlich 1997).

The resulting total number of records is 215,221, and the data set is pre-classified into two groups by their "survival" and "non-survival" attributes (Table  2).

In order to better be able to attribute potential differences between the groups to bereavement and its accompanying consequences, it was decided to divide married participants into two groups.