The phrase "attributed instead to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that a particular quality, action, or result is assigned to a different source or cause than originally thought.
Example: "The success of the project was attributed instead to the team's hard work rather than the new software."
Alternatives: "credited instead to" or "ascribed instead to".
The problem was attributed instead to the fact that in the original McClelland and Rumelhart model, the interactive activation process was completely deterministic and activations were transformed into response probabilities only at the moment of response selection.
The West's ascension over other parts of the world has been attributed, instead, to innate Western qualities, including rationality and a talent for invention and innovation, or Western institutions.
This memory illusion is normally associated with a feeling of familiarity, rather than recollection (e.g., as indexed by Remember/Know judgments), and has been explained in terms of an increased fluency of processing the test item, which, in the absence of awareness of the cause of that fluency (i.e., the masked prime), is attributed instead to prior exposure in the study phase.
The latter are systematically attributed, instead, to non-migrants' stereotypical understandings of migrants' life conditions, which would grossly neglect their hardships.
However, these results were not seen as actual reversals of nearsightedness, and were attributed instead to factors such as "improvements in interpreting blurred images, changes in mood or motivation, creation of an artificial contact lens by tear film changes, or a pinhole effect from miosis of the pupil".
While no specific mineral-binding motif has been described for albumin, the interaction of this protein with apatite crystals has been attributed instead to the multiple calcium-binding sites present on this protein [62]-[64] [62]-[64]
The Post repeats the common error of crediting Emanuel with the Democrats' 2006 victory, which many non-partisan observers attribute instead to Howard Dean's shrewd "50-state strategy".
Nelson explained that he could not believe that the buildings could collapse due to the planes, attributing instead the result to an implosion.
They attributed it instead to a coincidence of timing, a one-time budgetary quirk and a highly organized effort to obtain the vouchers.
However, this algorithm requires a categorical target attribute instead of a continuous one.
However, the J48 classification algorithm requires a categorical target attribute instead of a continuous one.
