The phrase "attributable to the errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the cause or reason for a particular outcome or situation that is linked to mistakes or inaccuracies.
Example: "The project's delays were largely attributable to the errors made during the initial planning phase."
Alternatives: "due to the errors" or "resulting from the errors".
The crash of a fighter jet near a freeway in January was attributable to the error of the pilot, who performed some maneuvers inadequately and suffered "spatial disorientation," the Air Force said yesterday.
On the contrary, these failures could be attributable to the measurement errors of variables we used, which are difficulties inherent in this study.
Principal component analysis showed that the microarray data derived from the CuE-treated cells and those from DMSO-treated cells constituted two spatially separated planes, suggesting that the treatment with CuE exhibits a much greater impact on gene expression profile than the levels of gene expression changes simply attributable to the technical errors.
However, some SNPs were false positive and could be attributable to the sequencing error on either S288C or RM11.
It is explicitly shown that the discrepancy between the results of approximate analytical solutions and those of these finite element solutions is attributable to these errors in the finite element formulations.
This difference is attributable to the types of error made.
Such discrepancies could (at least partly) be attributable to the higher experimental error inherent to NPQ800 measurements (see in Table 4 and Figure 8b the large standard deviations among the 3 experimental replicates of the random combinations tested for model validation: on average, RSD = 19.7% for NPQ800 and ≤9.0% for the other responses).
In the presence of the noise component attributable to ν, the error term η does not not need to be array-specific as it essentially reflects the equipment-related optical noise.
They made on average 1.45 (OFF: 0.86) perseverative errors (i.e. errors attributable to the fact that the subject incorrectly used the same classification rule after negative feedback) and 0.78 (OFF: 1.00) non-perseverative errors (loss of the rule) per WCST trial bloc.
Pollak further found that the error attributable to the practitioner cannot be quantified because examiners decide subjectively whether a pair of prints match--as both supporters and critics of the method agree.
