The phrase "attributable to firms" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the source or cause of something that can be linked to businesses or companies.
Example: "The increase in pollution levels is largely attributable to firms that do not adhere to environmental regulations."
Alternatives: "caused by companies" or "linked to businesses".
The part attributable to the worker should be a measure of skill, and the part attributable to firms should measure how well different firms pay, independent of who they hire.
Fleming found that the majority of gains resulting from threatened proxy contests were "attributable to firms which [we]re acquired within one year of the outcome of the proxy contest," suggesting that the gains were due to payment of a takeover premium (consistent with Greenwood and Schor's findings described below), not from operating improvements or governance changes.
This was because a good part of this year's growth spurt was attributable to firms replenishing their inventories sooner than had been expected.The OBR has accordingly trimmed its forecasts for growth over the next couple of years while raising its projection for this year.
It is often useful to include firm and year fixed effects in these models, especially when panel data is being utilized, since this soaks up the unobserved heterogeneity (attributable to firm- or time-specific characteristics) that could be affecting performance.
How much of the negative effects are attributable to tech firms is a matter of debate, but mayors — particularly those in areas in the running for the second Amazon headquarters — are thinking more acutely about how an expansion of tech jobs might close yawning inequality gaps.
This paper draws implications for technology policy from evidence on the size distribution of returns from eight sets of data on inventions and innovations attributable to private sector firms and universities.
However, propensity score matching applied to our discretionary accrual investigation reveals no significant differences, indicating that our results are most likely attributable to differences in firm characteristics.
They should be interpreted as warning remarks, that is, the information should be analyzed with caution since: (a) the company is exposed to potential risks whose effect depends on future (and therefore uncertain) events; or (b) some aspects could not be examined by the auditor due to causes which are not attributable to the audited firm.
These spillovers are attributable to the fact that firm level IT investments result in the automation and/or reengineering of internal processes downstream.
Eventually, a point of equilibrium is reached where the cost to do the transaction internally approximates the cost to do it externally, and the growth of the firm attributable to internalizing non-core workloads levels out.
