The phrase "attributable to false" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express that something can be assigned to falsehood, but it lacks clarity and proper context.
Example: "The discrepancies in the report are attributable to false information provided by the source."
Alternatives: "due to false" or "resulting from falsehood".
In the absence of definitive evidence to confirm that discordant results are attributable to false positive TST results, our current practice is to offer isoniazid preventive treatment irrespective of IGRA result.
Moreover, with this 23-gene signature based ER classification method we have distinguished a subset of IHC ER positive breast cancer patients that have a poorer outcome following endocrine therapy that may be attributable to false positive classification of ER status by current histopathological methods.
Inaccuracy was attributable to false positive laboratory diagnoses of malaria and the clinicians' disregard of negative slide results.
The authors explored this variable with the hypothesis that part of the increase in CDI incidence is attributable to false positive related to repeated testing [ 18].
The false-positives were either attributable to false-negative calls in the healthy sample, mostly due to low quality alignments or low coverage, or they were caused by false-positive calls in the diseased sample, often due to alignment artifacts caused by nearby InDels.
The discrepancy among studies may also be attributable to the false-positive or false-negative results.
Failure attributable to biopsy (false negative) was suspected when the biopsy was smaller than 15 mm and fragmented and without risk failure of FT [ 27].
As well, we found that there was a significant change in the percentage of AAA volume attributable to the false lumen (20.8 ± 11.8% versus 57.1 ± 10.2%, resp.; P < 0.001).
Failure attributable to biopsy (false negative) was suspected when the biopsy was smaller than 15 mm and fragmented, in the absence of risk factors of NT failure and with at least another sign of steato-hepatitis not belonging to Kleiner scoring system, such as piece meal necrosis.
Among the 11 clinically significant discordances (two classes difference) observed, nine were attributable to NT failure (eight false negatives and one false positive) and two to biopsy (false negatives).
The CrI method resulted in slightly higher power, but this was offset by a higher false positive rate relative to RZ. ROC analysis revealed that RZ significantly outperformed CrI, which appears mainly attributable to improved control of false positives.
