Exact(6)
All groups have the same median attractiveness score for the identical images (DI and EH), thus again indicating good repeatability.
Users don't get an attractiveness score but a "risk score" depending on the user's profile (passing verification, complaints, depth of dialogue, activity, etc).
Boost the taller guy's penis by just about centimeter, and the shorter guy needs double that to keep up and get the same attractiveness score.
It then determines the level of "foot traffic with purchase intent" for over 1.1 million retail locations across the country, and provides a retail attractiveness score that ranges from 1 to 100.
Then she computed an "attractiveness" score for each one, based on the earnings of part-time workers, their wages relative to full-time staff in the same profession, and the availability of benefits.
Since any school is considered more efficient than the other schools within its grouping if it possesses a larger contextual attractiveness score, it now becomes possible to rank order the schools within each stratum by sorting these scores.
Similar(54)
He noted that 60 percent of raters scored patients between 4 and 6 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most comely, so there was not much variation in overall attractiveness scores.
The math had to be done in reverse order: the individual attractiveness scores that subjects gave themselves on a 0-7 scale needed to be such that Stapel would get a small but significant difference in the average scores for each of the two conditions he was comparing.
Hence, each school in the highest level would receive L-1 separate contextual attractiveness scores, each school in the second highest level would receive L-2 separate attractiveness scores, and so on.
Hence, it is possible to rank each school within each stratum using a direct sorting of these contextual attractiveness scores.
The highest attractiveness scores were for image GL (107°), closely followed by image BF (118°) and image CG (127°).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com