Sentence examples for attitudinal differences in the from inspiring English sources

The first section contained 17 of the 18 attitudinal items of the original Patient Safety/Medical Fallibility Curriculum Survey, 5 with items related to the reporting of errors split into two items to evaluate attitudinal differences in the presence or absence of patient harm.

The study found substantial behavioral and attitudinal differences in these two groups.

The study was the first to explore the differences in smoking-related attitudes and behavior among the hospital physicians and nurses in Armenia and found substantial behavior and attitudinal differences in these two groups.

A human subject study was performed to assess both the objective behavioral differences in performance of the human-robot teams, as well as the subjective attitudinal differences in how people perceived agents with varying MTP capabilities.

Although this points to the possibility of cultural or attitudinal differences in perceptions, beliefs, and practices in sexually-related matters, underlying mechanisms for these observations are less clear.

Notably, people working in the health sector reported lower scores compared with those in the service industry.> -wrap-foot> a R = 0.2486 b R = 0.6309 c R = 0.1212 d Only variables statistically significant are shown * p <0.05, ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001 The three user groups exhibited marked attitudinal differences in several survey items (Tables  1, 3, and 4).

Second, the four aforementioned prototypes might not fit all nations because research has suggested attitudinal differences between the general public in the United States and Japan in their electronic medical records handling [ 36].

In sum, the results shown in Table 4 reveal attitudinal differences depending on the level of mastery of shadowing performance: that is, capable participants are likely to continue shadowing if they find it challenging, effective to their L2 learning, and if feedback is provided to show how much and where they need to improve.

However, structural and attitudinal differences between the two parts of Germany have remained, and the gap in non-marital childbearing has actually widened.

Moreover, the attitudinal differences are not reflected in actual civic behavior.

What is needed to press home a charge of irrationality is evidence of cognitive impairment independent of the attitudinal differences, and further evidence that this impairment is implicated in adherence to the disputed values.