The phrase "attitudes is a function" is not correct in English.
It should be "attitudes are a function" to agree in number. You can use it when discussing how attitudes can be influenced or determined by certain factors or variables.
Example: "In psychology, it is often said that attitudes are a function of personal experiences and social influences."
Alternatives: "attitudes depend on" or "attitudes result from".
We show that these underlying attitudes are a function of a number of socio-demographic characteristics, with young people, men with low income and those living closer to turbines having a stronger pro-wind power generation attitude.
The attitude component is a function of people's beliefs about the outcome of the behaviour combined with their evaluation of these outcomes (similar to outcome expectancies in social cognitive theory).
But changing attitudes is an uphill struggle.
In many cases, our attitude regarding risks is a function of features of the situation that are not correlated directly with the risk level, such as our perceived level of control and our familiarity with the activity (Tversky, Kahneman 1974; Tversky, Kahneman 1981; Slovic 1987; Weinstein 1989).
Similarly, the system matrix for the attitude dynamics, (F_r(t)), is a function of the state variable (omega ^b) and the attitude input matrix (G_r) is a function of (left[ p^b_c(t times right]) which needs to be estimated from the translational motion.
Notice that because the attitude error (second term) is a function of Bcrf(x k ), then Caa and Cbb change at each GN iteration.
"Attitude is a huge part of success.
According to the TPB, behavioural intention is a function of attitude, reflecting a favourable or unfavourable evaluation of the particular behaviour and subjective norm.
The TPB posits that behavioural intention is a function of attitude, reflecting a favourable or unfavourable evaluation of the particular behaviour and subjective norm, referring to the perceived social pressure to perform the behaviour.
