Exact(7)
We created an overall stigma score, assigning one point for each agreement with a negative attitude statement, and one point for each disagreement with a positive attitude statement.
A 'strongly agree' to a positive attitude statement or 'strongly disagree' to a negative attitude statement was given a score of 5. Conversely, a 'strongly disagree' with a positive attitude statement and 'strongly agree' with a negative attitude statement was give a score of 1. Attitude scores were summed giving a possible range of scores from 7 to 35.
After adjusting for these demographic variables, we found that only one attitude statement remained a predictor of recent antibiotic use.
Of note, only one attitude statement was significant in predicting antibiotic use, suggesting that all of the statements are measuring similar things (Table 4).
We found a significant effect of text4baby intervention exposure on increased agreement with the attitude statement "I am prepared to be a new mother" (OR = 2.73, CI = 1.04, 7.18, p = 0.042) between baseline and follow-up.
We found a significant effect of the exposure to the text4baby intervention on increased agreement with the attitude statement "I am prepared to be a new mother" (OR = 2.73, CI = 1.04, 7.18, p = 0.042) between baseline and follow-up.
Similar(53)
The attitude statements were grouped under four themes according to a factor analysis.
The ratings for 50 attitude statements about collaborative research were entered into a factor analysis.
In three experiments, we evaluated remembering and intentional forgetting of attitude statements that were either congruent or incongruent with participants' own political attitudes.
The Pre-test included 30 knowledge items and 14 attitude statements with student's response through a 5-point Likert scale.
General attitude and transportation-related attitude: in survey Part A and Part B, we asked a series of general attitude and transportation-related attitude statements on a 5-point scale from "strongly disagree" (1) to "strongly agree" (5).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com