The phrase "attitude caused" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the impact or influence of a person's attitude on a particular outcome or situation.
Example: "Her negative attitude caused a decline in team morale, making it difficult for everyone to stay motivated."
Alternatives: "attitude led to" or "attitude resulted in".
Obama's patronising attitude caused anger and did little to embellish his leadership credentials.
This attitude caused a serious misjudgment of the political forces in England, leading to the absurd hope of placing the infanta Isabella on the English throne upon the death of Elizabeth I.
The current paper reports a new phenomenon that the flow in a spiral tube element is sensitive to the element attitude caused by the Coriolis force, and that a valveless piezoelectric pump is designed by applying this phenomenon.
The president sometimes "exuded an unspoken exasperation: I saved Detroit, the Dow is up, we avoided a depression — I have to explain this to all of you again?" That attitude caused him to tank in his first debate with Mitt Romney.
This attitude caused her problems in Germany, culminating in her eviction from a pension lodging building, after student leaders complained of living with "a Marxist-leaning Jewess".
The sudden shift in Kabila's attitude caused consternation, not to mention irritation, among the diplomats who have been hoping to achieve a cease-fire and negotiated settlement to Zaire's seven-month civil war.
But a positive mental attitude does not cure cancer – any more than a negative mental attitude causes cancer".
This attitude causes behaviours (for example, failing to request additional diagnostic tests) that can in turn lead to diagnostic error.
Unfortunately, this attitude causes us to overlook more creative ways of getting what we want, such as making tradeoffs across issues.
This difference in attitude causes immediate unease — as if Justin and Kate are casual about something precious that their neighbours have been yearning for so desperately.
Worse, when its head-in-the-sand attitude causes seaside homes to be destroyed by storms, it will shelter behind an obscure 1949 law that absolves it of any responsibility to compensate residents.
