attendance at

USAGE SUMMARY

"attendance at" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to attending something or being present at an event or gathering. For example, "My attendance at the party was mandatory."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

Travel

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Attendance at games thinned to embarrassing numbers.

The New York Times - Sports

Attendance at Scott Stadium was down.

The New York Times

Naturally, attendance at race tracks was high.

The New Yorker

Attendance at the auction was low.

The New Yorker

Attendance at ballparks is up.

The New York Times

Average attendance at 18,500-seat Allstate Arena: 7,259.

The New York Times - Sports

Police put the attendance at 8,000.

The Guardian

"We saw great attendance at our programs.

The New York Times

Attendance at mosques is way up.

The New York Times

Attendance at the museum is steadily growing.

The New York Times - Travel

Attendance at these team meetings was unpaid.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing specific numbers, be precise. For example, instead of saying "Attendance at the meeting was good", state "Attendance at the meeting was 85 people".

Common error

Avoid using "attendance at" when referring to online events. Instead, use phrases like "participation in" or "engagement with" to better reflect the virtual nature of the event.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "attendance at" functions as a noun phrase acting as a subject or object, typically followed by a noun phrase specifying the event or location. Ludwig AI confirms it as correct and usable in written English. For instance, "Attendance at the museum is steadily growing."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Sports

15%

Science

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Travel

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "attendance at" is a versatile and frequently used phrase in English, primarily functioning as a noun phrase to denote the act of being present at an event or location. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability. Its usage spans across various contexts, from news and media to sports and science, maintaining a neutral register. When writing, ensure precision by specifying numbers when available and consider alternative phrases like "presence at" or "participation in" for nuanced meanings. Avoid using it for online events, opting for terms that better reflect virtual engagement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

presence at

Focuses more on the state of being present rather than the act of attending.

participation in

Highlights the act of taking part, implying a more active role than simple attendance.

number of attendees at

Emphasizes the quantity of people present at an event.

turnout for

Focuses on the number of people who showed up, often implying an expected or desired amount.

involvement in

Suggests a deeper level of engagement than just being present.

appearance at

Implies a formal or publicized presence.

rate of participation in

Highlights the proportion of people engaging in an activity.

audience at

Specifically refers to the people watching or listening to a performance or event.

visits to

Focuses on visiting a place, rather than attending an event.

population at

Refers to the number of people living in a certain place.

FAQs

How can I use "attendance at" in a sentence?

You can use "attendance at" to describe the number of people present at an event, such as "attendance at the meeting was higher than expected".

What's a formal alternative to "attendance at"?

In formal contexts, consider using "presence at" or "participation in" for a more sophisticated tone.

Is it correct to use "attendance at" for online events?

While technically acceptable, it's more accurate to use terms like "participation in" or "engagement with" when referring to online events.

How does "attendance at" differ from "turnout for"?

"Attendance at" is a general term, while "turnout for" often implies a specific event and may suggest whether the number of attendees met expectations.