The phrase "attacks why he was" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete thought and lacks context to be usable.
Example: "He often attacks why he was treated unfairly in the meeting."
Alternatives: "questions why he was" or "challenges why he was".
When Martin asked him after the first wave of attacks why he was doing this, Pig Farmer responded "If you notice the targets, They are all PUBLICLY traded companies, This was an attempt to put a "Scare" into internet stock holders, Also, Attacks WILL be carried out against Online trading companies, Dow, Onlinetrade, Etrade, etc".
Israeli officials claim that Mr Shehada was about to authorise a massive wave of new attacks in Israel and Gaza, which is why he was slain.But Fatah leaders and diplomats insist that the initiative was serious, and they cite two reasons in support of this claim.
The heavily edited transcript of a hearing on Jan . 30shows that a Justice Department lawyer told Judge Leonie M. Brinkema of Federal District Court in Alexandria, Va., that Mr. Moussaoui, the sole person facing trial in an American court for conspiring in the 9/11 attacks, "was keenly aware of why he was here -- it was to fly a plane into the White House".
He was not sure why he was attacked: Syrians say that these days, their accent is enough to invite hostility.
Pedro Paulo Silva, a 61-year-old peasant in San Pedro, said he never learned why he was attacked in April.
The police said they did not know if Mr. Ramirez had been inside the club, which they declined to identify, or why he was attacked.
Shazam was brainwashed, which is why he was attacking Superman (don't worry, he snaps out of it), but the image served as a reminder not to confuse your DC legends.
When pressed on why he was attacking the civil rights leader, Mr. Gore responded, "If the country is going to mature to the point where we are color-blind and see candidates in terms of their ability and leadership, then we must be prepared to engage in the rough and tumble of politics".
Spinoza's views on Scripture constitute, without question, the most radical theses of the Treatise, and explain why he was attacked with such vitriol by his contemporaries.
Is it just that he exceeded a one minute time limit -- that's why he was attacked?
I'm not even sure I fully understood the word or why he was attacking me, but I got the intent all right, and he even made the label sound like something despicable.
