attacked by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "attacked by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe someone or something being subjected to physical or verbal aggression. For example: "The victim was attacked by a group of strangers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Attacked by a gazebo!

Independent

Attacked by a nosebleed.

The Guardian - Sport

The dead included Jats attacked by Muslims.

The Economist

Was attacked by male hooded warbler.

The New Yorker

Her fortress was attacked by Venice.

The New York Times - Books

I got attacked by a tiger.

The New York Times - Sports

Refugee columns were attacked by helicopter gunships.

The Economist

I was attacked by my own guy.

The New York Times - Arts

I got attacked by a shark.

The New York Times - Sports

He feels personally attacked by the West.

The Economist

"Now Israel is not attacked by anyone.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "attacked by", ensure the subject clearly identifies the source or agent of the attack. Clarity prevents ambiguity and strengthens your writing.

Common error

Avoid vague attributions when using "attacked by". Clearly specify who or what initiated the attack to avoid confusion and maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "attacked by" primarily functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence is the recipient of an aggressive action. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

30%

Wiki

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "attacked by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction for describing situations where a subject experiences aggression or harm. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in written English. It is most commonly found in news, science, and wiki contexts, emphasizing its versatility across different registers. When using this phrase, clarity in identifying the source of the attack is crucial to avoid ambiguity. For variations, consider alternatives such as "assaulted by", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assaulted by

Replaces "attacked" with a synonym emphasizing a physical or verbal assault.

ambushed by

Suggests a surprise attack, focusing on the unexpected nature of the assault.

set upon by

A more formal or literary way of saying "attacked", indicating a deliberate assault.

afflicted by

Indicates being affected negatively, often by something non-physical like a disease or emotion.

overwhelmed by

Emphasizes being overcome by a large force or quantity, whether physical or metaphorical.

victimized by

Highlights the state of being a victim due to an attack or negative event.

besieged by

Suggests being surrounded and attacked, either literally or figuratively.

ravaged by

Implies severe damage or destruction caused by an attack or other destructive force.

troubled by

Indicates being disturbed or bothered by something, often in a less intense way than "attacked".

haunted by

Suggests being persistently bothered or tormented, often by something psychological or emotional.

FAQs

How can I use "attacked by" in a sentence?

Use "attacked by" to describe an instance where someone or something is subjected to aggression or harm. For example, "The city was attacked by enemy forces" or "The hiker was attacked by a bear".

What are some alternatives to "attacked by"?

You can use alternatives like "assaulted by", "ambushed by", or "set upon by" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was attacked by" or should I use another tense?

The phrase "was attacked by" is grammatically correct for past tense, passive voice constructions. Other tenses are also valid depending on the context, such as "is attacked by" (present tense) or "will be attacked by" (future tense).

What's the difference between "attacked by" and "affected by"?

"Attacked by" implies a direct assault or harmful action, while "affected by" suggests a broader influence or impact. For example, you're "attacked by" a virus, but "affected by" the weather.