Exact(2)
Our estimate of the intensity of nonlinear sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons generated by spermatophore attachment duration was considerably lower than the selection imposed by spermatophore attachment duration on male courtship song in T. commodus [ 30].
The results of our repeatability analysis further suggest that precopulatory sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbon profiles is of greater significance in T. oceanicus than postcopulatory sexual selection via spermatophore removal; the repeatability of a male's courtship duration across multiple females was significant, whereas the repeatability of spermatophore attachment duration was not.
Similar(58)
The repeatability estimates for courtship duration and spermatophore attachment duration were 0.13 (F91,368 = 1.715, p < 0.001) and 0.05 (F91,319 = 1.02, p = 0.436) respectively.
In general, increased spermatophore attachment duration is known to increase the amount of sperm transferred to females [ 24- 26], and this is also the case in T. oceanicus [ 26].
The treatment duration was 20 d.
However, relative spermatophore attachment and relative courtship duration were not strongly correlated (r = 0.170, n = 92, p = 0.105), suggesting that they may represent relatively independent contributions to male reproductive success.
Duration is 4.13 years.
The actual duration is irrelevant.
The duration is given as.
Likewise, the duration is important.
Before analysis, it was necessary to transform two of our attractiveness measures, courtship duration and spermatophore attachment duration, using natural logarithms as both were skewed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com