Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We further argue that AuZnδ droplets prefer to attack Zn atoms more than Se atoms because it is more energetically favorable because the heat of formation of Au-Zn (-0.27 eV/atom) [19] is lower than that of Au-Se (-0.15 eV/atom) [20].
Similar(59)
Gdm+ is one of the most weakly hydrated ions known; it interacts poorly with water because a single positive charge is diffusely shared by three nitrogen atoms and because it has a rigid structure unable to interact well with water molecules [ 44].
Void does not impede the motion of atoms because its essential quality is that of 'yielding,' in contrast to the mutual resistance of atoms.
This reconstruction clearly decreases the average coordination number of the atoms because to form it atoms must be taken from 12-fold-coordinated bulk sites placed in 9-fold-coordinated surface sites.
Atom was terrible because it had to be, though.
Aristotle criticizes him for not offering an account that says not only why a particular atom is moving (because it collided with another) but why there is motion at all.
However, in HAADF images, the static atomic displacements of the atoms, because of the strain in the epitaxial layers, also play an important role in the observed contrast[26, 27].
Antirealists are unpersuaded when it is suggested, for example, that a hypothesis about atoms should be accepted because it explains observable chemical phenomena.
While I absolutely despise most STEM toys I'm going to give Happy Atoms a pass simply because it is aimed at educators and not for the home market.
Bohr's model accounts for the stability of atoms because the electron cannot lose more energy than it has in the smallest orbit, the one with n = 1.
It might sound something a bit like the USSR demanding the world recognize its superpower status because it made big atom bombs, despite its inability to produce a working juicer or a drivable car.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com