Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "at which stringency" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the level of strictness or severity applied to a particular situation or standard.
Example: "The regulations vary significantly, depending on the context at which stringency is applied."
Alternatives: "at what level of strictness" or "at which level of severity".
Exact(1)
This illustrates one caveat when using duplicate removal tools such as JATAC or cd-hit-454, namely to determine at which stringency the reads should be filtered.
Similar(59)
However, at least some of the difference is likely attributable to the stringency at which we set our thresholds for DNAm.
In general, when calculating the duplicate rate for a dataset without comparing with a reference, the result strongly depends on the stringency at which reads are regarded as being 'similar enough'.
At the low stringency threshold at which inter-group relationships can be visualized using networks, many of the displayed edges represent poor alignments.
The 2012 Jacobin essay "Against Chairs" may mark the point at which the formula began to enter its self-parodying later phase, but, even so, one must admire the stringency of its author's condemnation: "Chairs suck.
Detection following a multiplex PCR is based on solid phase hybridization in microtiter plate format using general and type-specific probes at medium stringency, which makes the detection robust in case of small sequence variations.
The gaps and mismatches would suggest that mis-targeting of the morpholinos to the histone mRNA should not occur; however, S. purpuratus embryos develop at 15°C, which would reduce the stringency for hybridization.
This indicates that although probes were Tm-matched within a Tm range of 6°C they perform optimally at different stringencies, which supports previous observations [19] [20].
The third plasmid, which hybridised at lower stringency, may carry an A1-like, but different vlp gene.
Post-hybridisation washes were performed in 10% formamide in 0.1× SSC at 42°C, which is equivalent to 79% stringency.
This means that approximately 200 contigs were split at the higher stringency, which is less than 5% of initial total.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com