The phrase "at the specific case" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically intended to refer to a particular instance or situation, but the phrasing is awkward.
Example: "In the specific case of the experiment, we observed unexpected results."
Alternatives: "in this particular case" or "in the given instance".
GPDA chairman Pedro De La Rosa said on Friday if blow-outs occurred they would "look at the specific case and decide".
GPDA chairman Pedro De La Rosa, the Ferrari development driver, said: "The point is if there is a blowout, we will think about it, look at the specific case and decide.
It goes on to look at the specific case of Nairobi as it searches for solutions to the negative impacts of pollution through a lens which sees resolution of congestion effects as key to amelioration of traffic-related air pollution.
Folk beliefs, in this view, were embedded in the dynamics of everyday life, and they are, at least in the specific case discussed in this paper, indicative of two-way relatedness between people and various constituents of the material world.
Therefore, we conclude that the ligand positions "−4 to −7" are essential for selectivity and affinity of PDZ domain interactions, at least in the specific case of the first two PDZ domains of the PSD95 and SAP97 proteins.
An examination of Figure 2A shows that nact/N has a maximum with respect to y, suggesting that at least for the specific case of γ = α = 1, an optimal F2-to-F1 screening ratio, ymax, exists.
At least in the specific case of Enchi, the logging companies felled many trees in the natural forest before the migrants settled and started to plant cocoa.
France also took the grand, and inevitably provocative, position that at issue was not just the specific case of Iraq but also the general question of American power and of who makes decisions in world affairs: "unilateralist" Americans or a "multilateralist" body?
For the specific case at hand, where the fundamental bracket ([W, W] subset mathbb {K}) has zero component in W, the degree (n + n^prime - 1) is lowered to (n + n^prime -2) by the very argument proving that lemma.
For the specific case at hand, we set c l ( i ) ≜ { a i + - 1 b i } / 2 N for l = 14,…,113, with { a i, b i } ∈ { - 1, + 1 } 2. With such a choice we can produce up to 22N possible codes.
Reference to it serves to emphasise an institutional framing of the IFR and remove the need for deliberating the merits of the specific case at a panel meeting; it becomes a more or less straightforward case of 'the policy says no'.
