Sentence examples for at the early sampling from inspiring English sources

At the early sampling date, population-mean GSF was positively correlated with the proportion of individuals flowering (r = 0.800, P ≤ 0.001), mean plant height (r = 0.866, P ≤ 0.001) and mean leaf number (r = 0.658, P = 0.014).

Although this decline was proportionately similar for all crosses, the actual decline was much larger for the CI cross which had substantially more unhatched eggs at the earlier sampling period (the decline was 14% for the CI cross 14% and 1.5 2% for all the other crosses).

Initial glucose and acetate concentrations were set to the average of all values measured at the earliest sampling point of the monoculture incubations.

The initial glucose and acetate concentrations were set to the average value measured at the earliest sampling point (1 hr after incubation) for each type.

Even at the earliest sampling time (30 seconds), the fraction of cells with δ less than 1.117 was never 0 but varied between 1.5% and 5%.

In contrast, blood concentrations of miR-Rx34 were ∼6807 ng/mL at the earliest sampling time point (1 min) and decreased to ∼313 ng/mL within 24 h.

In the 1987 and later collections, the Oa was separated from the Oie before further processing; at the earlier sampling dates reported here, the forest floor was processed as a single sample.

The expression of 82 genes in CT berries but not in C berries at the earliest sampling stage is unlikely to reflect a response to treatment and is probably the consequence of inter-vine variability at the BV stage.

Levels of soluble PAs were already close to maximum (approximately 18 mg procyanidin B2 equivalent/g FW) at the earliest sampling time point (Fig.  4b), whereas insoluble PAs reached maximum levels at 3 WAP (Fig.  4c).

In common with WT and in contrast with WT-OVX and ERα−/−, WT-SN loaded tibiae achieved significance in both the pyruvate metabolism and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways at the earliest sampling point after loading.

For each gene, the number given at each stage indicates that the level of expression differed significantly compared with the level at the former stage; -, no significant difference; 0, zero detectable expression, for example, 6.59/0 indicates that the expression was not detected at the earlier sampling stage, but showed a transcript level of 6.59 at the current one.